From: Assessment of frailty: a survey of quantitative and clinical methods
 | Model Type | Assessment Method | Frailty Components | Frailty Scale | Evaluation Criterion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fried Phenotype [3] | Subjective and Objective | Weight Loss Weakness, Slow Walking, Low Physical Activity, Exhaustion | 7-point Frailty scale Non-Frail = No Phenotypes, Pre-Frail= 1 or 2 Phenotypes, Frail = More than 3 Phenotypes | covariate adjusted logistic model and Kaplan Meir |
2 | Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) [5] | Subjective | Comorbidity, Function Measures | 7-point Frailty scale | ROC, Interrater Reliability, Pearson Coefficient |
3 | Jones [14] | Impairments, Comorbidity Disability | Subjective | 13-Point Frailty Scale Mild = 1-7, Moderate = 7-13, Severe = >13 | Interrater Reliability, Sensibility |
4 | Edmonton Frail Scale [13] | Subjective | Cognitive Impairment, Balance and Mobility, Cognition, Heath Status, Functional Independence, Social Support, Medication Use, Nutrition, Mood and Continence | Maximum Score : 17 Severe Frail = Highest Score, Non-Frail= 0 | Interrater Reliability, Internal Consistency, Construct Validity |
5 | Subjective | Physical, Psychological, and Social | Maximum Score=15 Severe Level | Hierarchical And Logistic Regression Analysis Interrater Reliability, Internal Consistency | |
6 | Groningen Frailty Indicator [20] | Subjective | Physical, Psychological, Social and Cognition | Scale Range (0-4) Non-Frail =0, Severe Frail= (institutionalization) | Spearman Rank Correlations, Multi-Variate Regression Analysis |