From: Assessment of frailty: a survey of quantitative and clinical methods
 | Gait Parameters | Studies | Device | Clinical Test | Frailty Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gait Velocity | M. Schwenk et al. [26], A. Martinez-Ramirez et al. [42, 54], E. Gianaria et al. [19], N. Milor et al. [59], B. Hotrabhavananda et al. [48], A. Dubois et al. [62], A. Prochazka et al. [24] | 5 Inertial Sensor Unit Shank, Thighs And Lower Back [26], Tri-Axial Inertial Orientation [42], Kinect Sensor [19, 24, 48, 62], Single IMU on L3 [59], Tri-Axial Inertial Sensor Lumbar Spine (L3) Acceleration Signal(Vertical Direction Only) [54] | Walk of 4.5 m [26], 3m Walk Test [42], TUG [19, 48, 59], 3m Walk Test, F8W [48], 5m Walk Test [54] | Pre-Classified Using The Fried Phenotype [26, 59], Pre-frail, Frail and Robust [42], Correlation of TFI, TUG and Gait Parameters [19], Classified as Frail, Frail with Mild Cognitive and Robust [54] |
2 | Step And Stride Regularity, Approximate Entropy, Harmonic Ratio(HR), Total Harmonic Distortion | Tri-Axial Inertial Orientation [42], Tri-axial Inertial Sensor Lumbar Spine (L3) Acceleration Signal (Vertical Direction Only)[54] | Pre-Frail, Frail and Robust [42], Classified as Frail, Frail with Mild Cognitive and Robust [54] | ||
3 | Gait Symmetry | A. Martinez-Ramirez et al. [42] | Tri-Axial Inertial Orientation [42] | 3m Walk Test [42] | Pre-frail, Frail and Robust [42] |
4 | Gait Variability | A. Martinez-Ramirez et al. [54] | Tri-Axial Inertial Sensor Lumbar Spine (L3) Acceleration Signal (Vertical Direction Only) [54] | 5m Walk Test [54] | Classified as Frail, Frail with Mild Cognitive and Robust [54] |
5 | Signal Root Mean Square (RMS) Value | A.Martinez-Ramirez et al. [42] | Tri-Axial Inertial Orientation [42] | 3m Walk Test [42] | Pre-Frail, Frail and Robust [42] |
6 | Stride Length | M. Schwenk et al. [26], Hotrabhavananda et al. [48], A. Procházka el. [24, 46, 47], N.A. Capela et al. [45], | 5 Inertial Sensor Unit Shank, Thighs and Lower Back [26], Kinect [24, 46–48], Smartphone [45] | Walk of 4.5m [24, 26], TUG and F8W [48], 2–6 min Walk Test [45], Walk 4m (back and forth) five Times [47] | Pre-Classified Using the Fried Phenotype [26] |
7 | Stride Time | 5 Inertial Sensor Unit Shank, Thighs and Lower Back [26], Kinect [48] | Pre-Classified using the Fried Phenotype [26] | ||
8 | Double Support | 5 Inertial Sensor Unit Shank, Thighs and Lower Back [26], Kinect Sensor [19] | Pre-Classified Using the Fried Phenotype [26],Correlation of TFI, TUG and Gait Parameters [19] | ||
9 | Swing Time | E. Gianaria et al. [19] | Kinect Sensor [19] | TUG [19] | Correlation of TFI, TUG and Gait Parameters [19] |
10 | Stride Velocity | M. Schwenk et al. [26] | 5 inertial sensor unit shank, thighs and lower back [26] | Walk of 4.5m [26] | Pre-classified using the Fried Phenotype [26] |
11 | Cadence | N.A. Capela et al. [45] | Smart Phone [45] | 2–6 min Walk Test [45] |  |
12 | Dual Task Gait Patterns | Tri-Axial Inertial Sensor Lumbar Spine (L3) Acceleration Signal (Vertical Direction Only) [54], | 5 m Walk Test [54], Walk 10 m and Perform Two Cognitive Tasks Dual Task [67] | Classified as Frail, Frail with Mild Cognitive and Robust [54], Pre-Classified using Speechley and Tinetti Criterion [67] | |
13 | Foot Strikes,, Pelvis Acceleration, Number of Steps, Length Distance Traveled | N.A. Capela et al. [45] | Smart Phone [45] | 2–6 min Walk Test [45] |  |
14 | Number Of Steps | Smart Phone [45] | 2–6 min Walk Test [45], Walk 10 m and Perform Two Cognitive Dual Tasks [67] | Pre-Classified using Speechley and Tinetti Criterion [67] | |
15 | Step Time | 2–6 min Walk Test [45] |  | ||
16 | Step Length | A. Dubois et al. [62] | Kinect [62] | Â | Â |
17 | Toe-off speed, Mid-Swing speed, Mid-stance speed, propulsion duration, propulsion acceleration and speed norm | H.Rahemi. [43] | Inertial Sensor [43] | Walking Test [43] | Pre-Classified using the Fried Phenotype [43] |