Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference in LOP measurement between embedded and distal methods

From: Investigation of clinically acceptable agreement between two methods of automatic measurement of limb occlusion pressure: a randomised trial

  Upper Lower Combined
N 80 80 160
Bias ± SE −5.74 ± 0.73 4.11 ± 1.05 −0.81 ± 0.75
95% CI of bias −7.18 to −4.29 2.02 to 6.21 −2.29 to 0.66
SD of difference ± SE 7.54 ± 0.47 10.47 ± 0.69 10.35 ± 0.49
LOA −20.51 to 9.04 −16.40 to 24.64 − 21.10 ± 19.48
95% CI lower LOA −23.11 to −18.42 −20.21 to −13.33 −23.70 to − 18.86
95% CI upper LOA 6.94 ± 11.64 21.58 to 28.43 17.24 to 22.08
  1. LOP limb occlusion pressure, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, SE standard error, LOA limits of agreement, WSV within-subject variation, BSV between-subject variation