Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference in LOP measurement between embedded and distal methods

From: Investigation of clinically acceptable agreement between two methods of automatic measurement of limb occlusion pressure: a randomised trial

 

Upper

Lower

Combined

N

80

80

160

Bias ± SE

−5.74 ± 0.73

4.11 ± 1.05

−0.81 ± 0.75

95% CI of bias

−7.18 to −4.29

2.02 to 6.21

−2.29 to 0.66

SD of difference ± SE

7.54 ± 0.47

10.47 ± 0.69

10.35 ± 0.49

LOA

−20.51 to 9.04

−16.40 to 24.64

− 21.10 ± 19.48

95% CI lower LOA

−23.11 to −18.42

−20.21 to −13.33

−23.70 to − 18.86

95% CI upper LOA

6.94 ± 11.64

21.58 to 28.43

17.24 to 22.08

  1. LOP limb occlusion pressure, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, SE standard error, LOA limits of agreement, WSV within-subject variation, BSV between-subject variation
Back to article page

BMC Biomedical Engineering

ISSN: 2524-4426

Contact us