Skip to main content

Assistive technology: opportunities for societal inclusion of persons with disabilities and independence of the elderly


Assistive technology (AT) development worldwide aims to enhance the quality of life for persons with disabilities and elderly, yet its development and commercialization may face challenges. This collection aims at obtaining a better understanding of the hurdles that various stakeholders may face in the successful development and commercialization of AT.

Peer Review reports

Main text

Assistive technology (AT) has undergone significant evolution in recent decades. AT has evolved from simple mechanical devices to advanced tools that incorporate technologies such as wearables, machine learning, computer vision, and the internet of medical things (IoMT). One example of this transformation is the shift from traditional white canes used by visually impaired individuals to smart canes that utilize google maps, Global position system (GPS), or proximity sensors. The use of AT is essential in promoting social integration of people with disabilities (PWDs), increasing their independence, and ultimately improving their quality of life. Additionally, as the global aging population continues to increase rapidly, the elderly may also rely on AT to address problems and risks associated with aging frailty. However, to achieve its full potential, AT must receive a significant boost for adoption worldwide, considering economic and societal constraints, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

AT devices typically follow a standard technology development life cycle, which involves progressing from research to the development and validation of prototypes, followed by commercialization and adoption by target customers. The AT development life cycle, however, does not always follow this process smoothly or sequentially as intended. Thus, it is not surprising that different ATs showed various degrees of success in following the aforementioned progression. For instance, the adoption rate of smart canes remains low despite maturing into commercialization. This was partly attributed to negative user experiences associated with traditional cane use. Additionally, the high cost of the smart cane as perceived by individuals with impaired vision and their communities is a major factor that limited its wide scale use [1].

Similarly, the adoption of AT based on wearable sensors for fall prevention in the elderly has been challenged by concerns about their added value, cost, and ease of use, among other factors [2]. It is notable that although ATs for elderly fall prevention have been validated in controlled settings and in a few clinical trials, it is still uncertain whether they are clinically effective as standalone preventive measures for reducing fall rates [3]. Conversely, brain computer interface (BCI) devices appear to be stuck in the research and development phases of the cycle as there are several crucial factors that must be addressed before they can be broadly commercialized. These factors include signal quality, hardware performance, user experience and comfort, and the overall cost of the device. Other examples in this category include exoskeletons and visual prosthetics [4,5,6,7]. Although the first visual prosthetic device was approved by the FDA in 2013, these AT devices are still far from achieving commercial viability.

Successful examples of AT development, commercialization, and adoption are also available. Hearing aids and powered wheelchairs are two of these examples. In addition, companies like Apple, Google, and Microsoft made efforts to make their products accessible for PWDs on personal and mobile computing platforms. This accessibility has helped thousands of PWDs, albeit with various degrees. Moreover, the adoption of virtual reality and serious games in AT domain is gaining momentum worldwide, particularly after the paradigm shift brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated searching for alternatives that cope with staying at home needs [8]. Nevertheless, stronger research evidence is required to determine the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of these AT devices for types and degrees of disabilities and elderly conditions.

Successful adoption of AT depends on other considerations including individual-specific factors. For instance, sensor-based neuroprostheses are already available commercially, but their high cost not only of their production but also customization is a significant barrier to adoption. In addition, this type of AT may not be suitable for children due to their complex control and the necessity of frequent device changes to meet the rapid growth needs of children. Neuroprostheses still require further research and development efforts to address these issues [9].

The main goal of the announced special collection on AT ( is to bring under focus contributions from prominent researchers, industry professionals, government regulators, care givers, and other stakeholders in the field of AT. By analyzing these contributions and comprehending their position as related to different phases of development and commercialization, it would be possible to gain insight into the obstacles and factors that affect this process. This understanding could potentially aid all stakeholders in devising plans to help create and successfully commercialize AT devices that are of practical value and accessible globally at an affordable price. Such collective efforts can be a significant driver towards better societal integration of PWDs and greater independence for the elderly.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Assistive Technology


Brain Computer Interface


Global Position System


Internet of Medical Things


People With Disabilities


  1. Milallos R, Tibdewal V, Wang Y, Udegbe A, Oh T. An Exploratory Study on the Low Adoption Rate of Smart Canes. Univers Access Human-Computer Interact User Context Divers 16th Int Conf UAHCI. Held as Part 24th HCI Int Conf HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part II. Springer. 2022;2022:492–508.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–6. Available from:

  3. Morris ME, Webster K, Jones C, Hill A-M, Haines T, McPhail S, et al. Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2022;51. Available from:

  4. Portillo-Lara R, Tahirbegi B, Chapman CAR, Goding JA, Green RA. Mind the gap: State-of-the-art technologies and applications for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. APL Bioeng. AIP Publishing LLC; 2021;5:31507.

  5. Colucci A, Vermehren M, Cavallo A, Angerhöfer C, Peekhaus N, Zollo L, et al. Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Exoskeletons in Clinical Neurorehabilitation: Ready or Not? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. 2022;36:747–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rapeaux AB, Constandinou TG. Implantable brain machine interfaces: first-in-human studies, technology challenges and trends. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;72:102–11. Available from:

  7. Borda E, Ghezzi D. Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges. Prog Biomed Eng. 2022;4:32003 IOP Publishing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pallavicini F, Pepe A, Clerici M, Mantovani F. Virtual Reality Applications in Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10:e35000. Available from:

  9. Bonizzato M. Neuroprosthetics: an outlook on active challenges toward clinical adoption. J Neurophysiol American Physiological Society Bethesda. 2021;125:105–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.RY & A.M conceived and drafted the Editorial. AM revised the Editorial. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Aliaa Rehan Youssef is a Professor of Orthopedic Physical Therapy and Biomechanics at the faculties of Engineering and Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt. She received her PhD in Biomechanics from the University of Calgary, Canada. Dr Rehan Youssef is a co-founder and clinical research consultant at TRUST research center, Egypt. She has over 20 years of clinical expertise as a consultant physiotherapist at various clinical settings. She also serves as a clinical advisor for VRapeutic; a UNICEF portfolio company for therapeutic and rehabilitative solutions. Her primary research focus is rehabilitation technology and she has many international publications. She is also an associate editor of the Bulletin of the Faculty.

Professor Ahmed Morsy is the Chair of the Biomedical Engineering department at Cairo University and the Strategy Team Lead at the Faculty of Engineering – Cairo University. Dr. Morsy is the Founder and Chairman of Nebras Technology, an Egyptian venture focused on healthcare information management solutions. He received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University, USA. Dr. Morsy was the Editor in Chief of the IEEE Pulse magazine. He was Lead R&D Engineer at Philips Medical Systems in Seattle, USA and was also the General Manger of IBE Technologies, Egypt. He later served as senior advisor on IT strategy planning to the Chairman of Egypt National Post Organization and held the position of Senior Program Manager at the Microsoft Innovation Center in Cairo. Dr. Morsy has several United States patents and international publications.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliaa Rehan Youssef.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rehan Youssef, A., Morsy, A. Assistive technology: opportunities for societal inclusion of persons with disabilities and independence of the elderly. BMC biomed eng 5, 6 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: